[Hirdyansh-bh]

Summary of Changes

Fixes #13165.

Closed railway=turntable ways were rendering with the default untagged area style (translucent white fill and generic gray outline) because tag-railway-turntable was not defined in css/25_areas.css.

This change adds path.stroke.tag-railway-turntable and path.fill.tag-railway-turntable to the /* Dark Gray things */ section in css/25_areas.css, rendering turntable polygons consistently with other railway and paved infrastructure (like tag-landuse-railway and tag-amenity-parking).

Verification

• Tested locally on the turntable referenced in Map rendering for railway=turntable #13165 (#map=22/32.7028492/-117.1537513).
• Passed test suite (npm run test:once: 138 files passed, 2302 tests passed).
• Passed type check (npm run test:typecheck).

Note on LLM usage: A LLM was used to understand and breakdown the issue. All the changes made to the code have been done by me and I have complete knowledge of the changes made.

[matkoniecz]

Note on LLM usage: A LLM was used to understand and breakdown the issue. All the changes made to the code have been done by me and I have complete knowledge of the changes made.

it looks like PR description is also LLM generated

[matkoniecz]

for code change itself - it seems correct and making sense, and simpler than I expected

[Hirdyansh-bh]

Fair point! I used it to format and structure the description write up neatly, but from now on , I'll write it by myself.
Also I am glad to hear that the code change itself looks good and makes sense!

[matkoniecz]

https://pr-13166--ideditor.netlify.app/#disable_features=boundaries&map=19.94/50.02770/19.98638&background=Bing

maybe it can get some sort of extra border? To be more visible?

[Hirdyansh-bh]

Added a dedicated 2px #444 border so the rim remains defined against dark aerial imagery even when deselected.

##BEFORE

##AFTER

[matkoniecz]

though people with a better taste may request followup changes...

[matkoniecz]

hmmm, how it looks when mapper zooms out (with this feature deselected)

do we need extra low-zoom rule? seems not needed for me, but would make it a tiny bit better

left one on a white building is a test data

[Hirdyansh-bh]

Ah, I see that, it does look a bit heavy when zoomed out like that. I am completely down to add a low-zoom rule to give it that extra polish (maybe we drop the stroke back to 1px at lower zooms?).

It will be a quick change—just give me the green light and I’ll push the update right away! 😄

[matkoniecz]

oh, you do not need permission - feel free to try tweaking (though best to post updated takes how it looks once finished)

[Hirdyansh-bh]

sure, will revert in a few minutes

[matkoniecz]

reverting should not be needed- low zoom style is added with extra property

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/13042/changes was using some not trick that may be not needed here - take look at other low zoom definitions

[Hirdyansh-bh]

Makes sense! I avoided the :not() trick and just flipped the logic to match standard conventions: it now defaults to 1px for all lower zooms, and only thickens to 2px at .z18 and above. Just pushed the update.