Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
"CVE-2026-106118"
],
"summary": "ImageSharp: Tiled fax TIFF: tile buffer sized by TileWidth but fax decompressor writes scanlines of ImageWidth — heap OOB write",
"details": "## Summary\n\nWhen decoding a tiled TIFF with fax compression (T4/T6/MH), `DecodeTilesChunky` allocates each tile buffer from **TileWidth** (`ceil(TileWidth*bpp/8)*TileLength` bytes) but constructs the fax decompressor with **frame.Width**: `TiffDecompressorsFactory` ignores the `isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight` parameters entirely. The T4/T6/MH decompressors treat the full image width as the scanline length and advance (and really write, via read-modify-write bit ops) `frame.Width` bits per row, with no bounds check against the tile buffer. The very first tile therefore writes linearly out of bounds — about `ImageWidth/8` bytes per row × TileLength rows into a `TileWidth`-sized buffer. With ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16 this writes ~2 MB past a 32-byte buffer and kills the process deterministically; a T6 all-white variant advances the bit offset by >512 MB silently, showing an alarm-free heap-corruption window for the same defect. A crafted file fully controls the OOB length per tile and works with perfectly legal per-row run codes (no overlong runs needed).\n\nVerified at commit `5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8` (main; latest release v4.1.0, the supported major).\n\n## Details\n\nRoot cause: a size mismatch between tile buffer allocation and decompressor width, because the factory drops the tile parameters.\n\n- Allocation: [TiffDecoderCore.cs#L792-L794](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/TiffDecoderCore.cs#L792-L794) — `bytesPerTileRow = RoundUpToMultipleOfEight(tileWidth*bitsPerPixel)`; tile buffer = `bytesPerTileRow*tileLength` bytes (32 bytes in the PoC)\n- Mismatch: [TiffDecoderCore.cs#L797](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/TiffDecoderCore.cs#L797) — `CreateDecompressor<TPixel>(frame.Width, ..., isTiled: true, tileWidth, tileLength)` passes the full frame width\n- Factory drops tile params: [TiffDecompressorsFactory.cs#L56-L64](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/Compression/TiffDecompressorsFactory.cs#L56-L64) — T4/T6/MH decompressors receive only `width` (= frame.Width); `isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight` ignored\n- OOB write sink: [T4TiffCompression.cs#L69-L119](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/Compression/Decompressors/T4TiffCompression.cs#L69-L119), `T6TiffCompression.cs#L76-L108` — per-row advance of `this.width` bits via `BitWriterUtils.WriteBits` with no buffer-length check ([BitWriterUtils.cs#L51](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/Compression/BitWriterUtils.cs#L51)); note `TiffDecoderCore.cs:829-831` later reads the buffer in `bytesPerTileRow` strides, confirming the protocol expects tile-width rows\n\nAttack surface: `Image.Load(stream)` on an attacker-supplied tiled TIFF (`TiffDecoderCore.DecodeImageWithTiles` → `DecodeTilesChunky`). Default configuration; only requirement is a standard tiled TIFF header (TileWidth=16, TileLength=16) + Compression=3 (T4; T6 also constructible).\n\n**Suggested remediation:**\n1. Short-term: when `isTiled`, construct the T4/T6/MH decompressor with `tileWidth` (not frame width), or clip row writes to the caller-provided buffer length.\n2. Root fix: bound the write side of `BitWriterUtils` (pass remaining bits), and validate every fax row advance against buffer capacity on both tiled and strip paths.\n3. Regression tests: Compression=2/3/4 × tiled with TileWidth < ImageWidth, including a T6 black-pixel row (forces real `WriteBit`).\n\n## PoC\n\nFull PoC posted as the first comment below: `Program.cs` (driver), `poc-tiled-t4.tif` (crafted file, ~9.8 KB, base64 inline), README.\n\n1. Build a small console project referencing `src/ImageSharp/ImageSharp.csproj` and run it against the crafted file (or call `Image.Load` on it from any host).\n2. Observed with ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16, T4 with 400 makeup codes + EOL per row:\n\n ```\n tile payload 9642 bytes; rows write ~2,048,000 bytes into a 32-byte buffer\n Fatal error. System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory.\n at SixLabors.ImageSharp.Formats.Tiff.Compression.BitWriterUtils.WriteBits(Span`1<Byte>, IntPtr, IntPtr, Byte)\n at ...T4TiffCompression.WritePixelRun(...)\n at ...T4TiffCompression.Decompress(...)\n Aborted (core dumped); exit=134\n ```\n\n3. Controls: the same file with Compression=None decodes normally (container is fine); a T6 all-white-rows variant advances >512 MB of bit offset without a real write (silent corruption window) before tripping on a directory-level TileOffsets count check.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **What it is:** out-of-bounds write (CWE-787). For any service decoding untrusted tiled TIFFs: remote, default-configuration, deterministic process crash (DoS), plus a heap OOB write whose per-tile length and row width are attacker-tunable — a potential code-execution surface. This is a vulnerability in the library itself, in scope of your SECURITY.md.\n- **Who is impacted:** applications decoding untrusted TIFF with SixLabors.ImageSharp at the current major (verified on main past v4.1.0); tiled + fax-compressed files are the trigger, which ordinary TIFF writers can produce.\n\n---\n\n---\n\nReported by **Kimi Security Team** (bug-report@moonshot.ai).",
"details": "### Patched versions\n\nFixed in ImageSharp **3.2.0** and **4.1.1**. Users on v3 should upgrade to 3.2.0; users on v4 should upgrade to 4.1.1 or later.\n\n## Summary\n\nWhen decoding a tiled TIFF with fax compression (T4/T6/MH), `DecodeTilesChunky` allocates each tile buffer from **TileWidth** (`ceil(TileWidth*bpp/8)*TileLength` bytes) but constructs the fax decompressor with **frame.Width**: `TiffDecompressorsFactory` ignores the `isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight` parameters entirely. The T4/T6/MH decompressors treat the full image width as the scanline length and advance (and really write, via read-modify-write bit ops) `frame.Width` bits per row, with no bounds check against the tile buffer. The very first tile therefore writes linearly out of bounds — about `ImageWidth/8` bytes per row × TileLength rows into a `TileWidth`-sized buffer. With ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16 this writes ~2 MB past a 32-byte buffer and kills the process deterministically; a T6 all-white variant advances the bit offset by >512 MB silently, showing an alarm-free heap-corruption window for the same defect. A crafted file fully controls the OOB length per tile and works with perfectly legal per-row run codes (no overlong runs needed).\n\nVerified at commit `5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8` (main; latest release v4.1.0, the supported major).\n\n## Details\n\nRoot cause: a size mismatch between tile buffer allocation and decompressor width, because the factory drops the tile parameters.\n\n- Allocation: [TiffDecoderCore.cs#L792-L794](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/TiffDecoderCore.cs#L792-L794) — `bytesPerTileRow = RoundUpToMultipleOfEight(tileWidth*bitsPerPixel)`; tile buffer = `bytesPerTileRow*tileLength` bytes (32 bytes in the PoC)\n- Mismatch: [TiffDecoderCore.cs#L797](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/TiffDecoderCore.cs#L797) — `CreateDecompressor<TPixel>(frame.Width, ..., isTiled: true, tileWidth, tileLength)` passes the full frame width\n- Factory drops tile params: [TiffDecompressorsFactory.cs#L56-L64](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/Compression/TiffDecompressorsFactory.cs#L56-L64) — T4/T6/MH decompressors receive only `width` (= frame.Width); `isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight` ignored\n- OOB write sink: [T4TiffCompression.cs#L69-L119](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/Compression/Decompressors/T4TiffCompression.cs#L69-L119), `T6TiffCompression.cs#L76-L108` — per-row advance of `this.width` bits via `BitWriterUtils.WriteBits` with no buffer-length check ([BitWriterUtils.cs#L51](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/Compression/BitWriterUtils.cs#L51)); note `TiffDecoderCore.cs:829-831` later reads the buffer in `bytesPerTileRow` strides, confirming the protocol expects tile-width rows\n\nAttack surface: `Image.Load(stream)` on an attacker-supplied tiled TIFF (`TiffDecoderCore.DecodeImageWithTiles` → `DecodeTilesChunky`). Default configuration; only requirement is a standard tiled TIFF header (TileWidth=16, TileLength=16) + Compression=3 (T4; T6 also constructible).\n\n**Suggested remediation:**\n1. Short-term: when `isTiled`, construct the T4/T6/MH decompressor with `tileWidth` (not frame width), or clip row writes to the caller-provided buffer length.\n2. Root fix: bound the write side of `BitWriterUtils` (pass remaining bits), and validate every fax row advance against buffer capacity on both tiled and strip paths.\n3. Regression tests: Compression=2/3/4 × tiled with TileWidth < ImageWidth, including a T6 black-pixel row (forces real `WriteBit`).\n\n## PoC\n\nFull PoC posted as the first comment below: `Program.cs` (driver), `poc-tiled-t4.tif` (crafted file, ~9.8 KB, base64 inline), README.\n\n1. Build a small console project referencing `src/ImageSharp/ImageSharp.csproj` and run it against the crafted file (or call `Image.Load` on it from any host).\n2. Observed with ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16, T4 with 400 makeup codes + EOL per row:\n\n ```\n tile payload 9642 bytes; rows write ~2,048,000 bytes into a 32-byte buffer\n Fatal error. System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory.\n at SixLabors.ImageSharp.Formats.Tiff.Compression.BitWriterUtils.WriteBits(Span`1<Byte>, IntPtr, IntPtr, Byte)\n at ...T4TiffCompression.WritePixelRun(...)\n at ...T4TiffCompression.Decompress(...)\n Aborted (core dumped); exit=134\n ```\n\n3. Controls: the same file with Compression=None decodes normally (container is fine); a T6 all-white-rows variant advances >512 MB of bit offset without a real write (silent corruption window) before tripping on a directory-level TileOffsets count check.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **What it is:** out-of-bounds write (CWE-787). For any service decoding untrusted tiled TIFFs: remote, default-configuration, deterministic process crash (DoS), plus a heap OOB write whose per-tile length and row width are attacker-tunable — a potential code-execution surface. This is a vulnerability in the library itself, in scope of your SECURITY.md.\n- **Who is impacted:** applications decoding untrusted TIFF with SixLabors.ImageSharp at the current major (verified on main past v4.1.0); tiled + fax-compressed files are the trigger, which ordinary TIFF writers can produce.\n\n---\n\n---\n\nReported by **Kimi Security Team** (bug-report@moonshot.ai).",
"severity": [
{
"type": "CVSS_V3",
Expand All @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "ImageSharp"
"name": "SixLabors.ImageSharp"
},
"ranges": [
{
Expand All @@ -27,6 +27,25 @@
{
"introduced": "3.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.2.0"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "SixLabors.ImageSharp"
},
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.1"
}
Expand Down
Loading